The main difference between the border issues of Oregon and Texas is the way these issues were settled. The Texas issue resulted in a war with Mexico, which gained land and lost soldiers. However, this did allow the US to gain more land than just Texas.
The Oregon issue, on the other hand, was more peaceful. The US negotiated and made a treaty with Britain instead of going to war with them. However, both these issues were different ways the US gained land and expanded their nation. Both Polk and Pierce studied law. Polk later became Governor of Tennessee. Polk, although unknown, linked the Texas and Oregon issues to gain favor in both the North and the South and become president.
Pierce, on the other hand served in the Mexican War and was nominated for president in The slightest hint of expansion set off the wrath of the North. The two viewpoints on the issue of Texas would be the American viewpoint and the Mexican viewpoint. The Americans believed that the land west of them should belong to them, they had no respect for others.
They simply moved in and declared it their land. From the Mexican viewpoint, this was stealing the land, the Americans did not think the same way, so that brought up a conflict.
The Mexicans saw the Americans as the enemy, and vice versa, so they started fighting. Finally, after a bloody war, the Americans won and got to keep Texas.
The US Government used both negotiation and military strength to gain territory. The addition of Oregon was an example of the US government using negotiation. Most of the time, the US used peaceful means to acquire land, they bought or traded land from other countries that occupied the surrounding area such as Britain and France, this is how the US gained the Oregon Territory.
However, when a country was not willing to give up its land, they would take it by force, the Mexican War is an example of this. After their defeat, the Mexicans gave up the California region in the Mexican Cession. These means were successful and the US expanded to the pacific ocean. Based on that theory, the US encouraged expansion Westward without regard for the fact that Native American civilizations already occupied that land. There was a notion that those civilizations were not "civilized" and that God favored the United States government and influence.
They viewed the territory between the Atlantic and the Pacific basically as an island that they thought could only sensibly be under one rule, with people speaking the same language and observing similar and, to their mind, superior customs. With the notion that this land was God-given and that it was inevitable Destiny that it should belong to the United States, there was very little concern for the native americans on the land, except to the extent that some people supported assimilating friendly native americans because it would be "good for them.
This displacement, and the generally-exploitative trade and commerce that the Americans engaged in with them also disrupted the Native Americans' ways of life e. With respect to the landscape of the West, it was also transformed physically by this expansion. As the white people expanded, they brought with them their notions of farming including irrigation, the crops they chose to plant, the animals they relied on and of construction and industry.
They constructed train-tracks, they took over plots of land and prepared them for agriculture, etc. They also eradicated some animal populations, tamed others, and brought some others with them, which further transformed the way the land was used. Related Questions Essay on Manifest Destiny? Is there a good thesis statement for manifest destiny essay?
I have an essay due tomorrow about manifest destiny? Answer Questions How to choose a voting system? Can someone help me write a claim for my world studies class about early civilzation? Which are the best websites for homework help?
Manifest Destiny And Sectional Discord Since the time of the term Manifest Destiny appeared it had many meanings and definitions. For Americans, after the successful end of the war, the feeling of Nationalism extended its victorious lands.
Free manifest destiny papers, essays, and research papers.
Manifest Destiny DBQ Manifest Destiny was the belief that the United States had the god given right to expand throughout the country from the East coast to the West coast. The term Manifest Destiny was created by John L. O’Sullivan in Manifest Destiny Questions and Answers - Discover the wegostyle.ml community of teachers, mentors and students just like you that can answer any question you might have on Manifest Destiny.
Manifest Destiny essays There were many country-splitting issues that characterized the United States in the 's. A major one of these was Manifest Destiny, the belief that the United States was destined to extend its territory west to the Pacific Ocean. The country separated as many peopl. Essay on Race and Manifest Destiny In the early to mid-nineteenth century, population growth, land speculation, and unwarranted greed caused not only a national desire, but also a .