An expository essay sets out to describe the issue in its current state, without any evaluations. Here, you can talk about the current state of the gun control regulations. Persuasive gun control essay. A persuasive essay is where you have to convince an opponent that you are right. For example, you can try and convince a pro gun control lobbyist that strict regulations are not the answer to a problem.
Evidently, gun control as an essay topic gives the most fertile ground for persuasive and argumentative essays. So, these are the most common kinds of essays that students have to write on gun control. Usually, an exciting argumentative essay starts with a controversial topic that suggests two or more polar opinions on it. With gun control, it should not pose any problem. You do have to avoid any emotional language, but you still need to have your own argument on the issue.
Given the controversial nature of the topic, this should also pose no problem: The next thing you do is collect evidence to support your argument. This may include collecting evidence in support of the opposing argument for you to rebuke. There is a lot of material on both sides of the argument, so even an extensive research for your gun control argumentative essay should not be too challenging.
Once you have conducted your research, it is time to start writing. Just as any other essay, an argumentative essay on gun control comprises of three parts: In the introducing paragraph, you present your topic to the reader by giving some relevant background information and stating your standpoint on the issue in your thesis statement.
The main body of your essay will consist of three parts: In the conclusion of your gun control argumentative essay, you briefly re-state your standpoint and why it is the right one. Persuasive essays are largely similar to argumentative ones, so much that it may be difficult to pinpoint the difference at first. This difference mainly lies in the ways by which you prove the rightness of your claim.
Let us take a closer look at these ways. The commonly accepted classification suggests three main methods of persuasion: Logos employs logic to appeal to the reader's rationality. Pathos uses the irrational and appeals to emotion. Ethos employs authority and appeals to the sense of ethics. As we have mentioned, an argumentative essay focuses on proving the rightness of your argument rationally - so, it employs logos as the only method of persuasion.
In a persuasive essay, on the other hand, you focus on your result - persuading your reader. Thus, you can employ whichever of the three methods of persuasion you like in any combination. When we talk specifically about gun control, it is a heavily emotional topic, so it is hard to stick to dry facts and logic exclusively. So, when writing a gun control persuasive essay, not only logical but also ethical and emotional appeal is probably much easier than writing an argumentative essay and sticking to logic.
Consequentially, an argumentative essay suggests that you use neutral language at all times, whereas in a persuasive essay you can relax and write in moderately emotional language here and there. The writing and pre-writing processes for a persuasive essay will not be different from those for an argumentative one: As we have discussed, gun control is an extremely broad and multi-angled topic.
Naturally, it is much bigger than one can cover in any essay, and you can investigate this topic in a gun control research paper or even bigger academic papers. If you choose to write a research paper on gun control, however, you will still find that the topic is too broad and you will have to narrow it down according to your personal and academic interest. Still, if you find a particular gun control-related topic interesting, it is not enough to make a good topic for a research paper.
It also has to be original, i. On the bright side, you usually will not have to pick a fixed topic and stick to it. At the initial stage of your work, you can formulate your subject somewhat vaguely and specify and adjust the topic to your liking with the course of your research.
Another distinct feature of a research paper is that it needs a presentable list of referenced sources. You do not have to stick to other authors' writing here. You are also allowed often even encouraged to get and use your own empirical findings.
One final thing that you need to know about a research paper is that it needs to focus on the research data - facts and analytics, rather than opinions and reflections - your own or those of other authors. Gun control is one of those topics that encourage us to be biased and express opinions. Hence, there are lots of opinions on gun control out there - both pro and anti, - and most probably, you have one as well.
However, when you are writing an academic paper, you cannot make your writing strictly opinion-based. Regardless of what kind of assignment you are writing, everything you write there has to refer to hard evidence. This emotional piece is written by the widow of Chris Kyle whose tragic story was put on screen in American Sniper.
If you want to know more about her take on gun control policy, you can read about it on her book American Wife: As a recognized author of books on crime and a respected teacher at Pepperdine University, Wilson uses his expertise to analyze what exactly pro gun control side has to offer. He concludes that they are being too populist and have no concrete plan of action. Hunter works of Rand Paul, the conservative senator. The article focuses on stories where gun-owning individuals helped to confront crime and violence, as opposed to the stories where such individuals cause violence — that the pro gun control lobbyists like to manipulate.
Hardy is a practicing attorney from Arizona. He blames pro gun control activists for being deaf to arguments from the anti gun control camp and incapable of a constructive dialogue.
According to him, they only see their position and will not rest until all individual firearm possession is banned for good. Being well-informed about the gun control debate is crucial for writing an excellent gun control essay, but it is still only half the battle.
You still need to know what kind of essay you have to submit and what your teacher expects of you. Here are the kinds of gun control essays that you may have to write:. Since gun control is an extremely debatable topic, it is most exciting to talk about which side of the debate is right.
This is why, students most often have to write either argumentative or persuasive essays on gun control. If you have to write a persuasive essay, you know what you should do first — pick a topic that can inspire a debate between at least two opposing sides.
You also need a compelling argument that you will defend. Here, you also have nothing to worry about, because both sides of the gun control debate have numerous compelling arguments. As soon as the latter two elements are in place, it is the high time to start your research. Putting it briefly, first, you get yourself familiar with the relevant historical background of the issue, and then you collect expert opinions. Notably, you should not limit yourself to the expert opinions from your side of the debate.
You should also be aware of what your opponents have to say, so you know how to rebuke their claims in advance. As you know, a persuasive essay is the kind of essay where you have to convince a hypothetical opponent that your viewpoint on the subject is correct and theirs is not.
So, this is your ultimate goal when writing such an essay and you should use all means at hand to achieve it. By all means at hand we mean each of the three methods of persuasion:. Ultimately, you can use all three of these methods of persuasion in your gun control persuasive essay, but using all three is not necessary. You can even stick to just one, so long as you achieve your main goal — persuade your reader.
An argumentative essay on gun control is harder to write than a persuasive one because here you can only use logic to prove your point, i. Gun control is the kind of topic that inspires emotion, so it is hard to stick to logic and restrain from emotion. Yet, the format of a gun control argumentative essay demands just that. This is the most noteworthy feature by which you differ a gun control argumentative essay from a persuasive one. The rest — the overall goal, the research, and the writing process — will be the same.
If you get particularly interested in the discussion around the gun control regulations, you are sure to dig up much more material than one may need for an essay. Truly, this topic is so deep and broad, and it can be investigated under so many angles and on so many levels, that you can write much bigger papers about it: In fact, you can devote your entire career to researching gun control. Of course, a research paper is bigger in volume than an average essay, but still, a single research paper is not nearly enough to cover all there is to cover about gun control.
So, if you set out to write a gun control research paper, the first thing for you to do is to narrow down your topic to make it more specific. Usually, students are allowed to re-formulate their research paper topics on the go, should they come up with something more interesting and original while conducting a research.
Speaking of research, you are not limited to using printed sources by other authors. In fact, chances are you will be encouraged to conduct an empirical research of your own for example, a survey and refer to it among other sources — which should count no less than five. The most important feature of a research paper is that it centers on the research data — facts, statistics, and analytics — and leaves out all speculations and opinions.
Save this discount code: Gun Control Essay Today, gun control has become one of those topics that everybody talks about. The most noteworthy relevant court cases are as follows: Cruikshank — United States v. Miller — District of Columbia v.
Another reason gun control should be enforced is because if not, a mentally unstable person could get a hold of one and do something out of their control. By allowing someone unstable to have a gun, people are just setting themselves up for disastrous conclusions. If guns were not easy to get then Sandy Hook Elementary would be normal and all of those parents would not be childless. By allowing this problem to occur a first time is unforgivable; doing nothing to stop it from happening again is unprincinpled.
Keeping the current laws as they are makes it seem as if there is no sympathy for what happened and now nothing will change. The final reason that being pro-gun control is effective is the simple fact of safety.
Not only is it unsafe for just anyone to have a gun, it is also unsafe for everyone trained or not to walk around, armed, at all times. There have been serious incidents where guns were unintentionally fired, but still caused a big problem when they did. Having guns available to anyone in a home at any time can lead to serious problems, injuries or deaths. Many cases have also come up where a teenager in the house takes the family gun to school or winds up shooting his own family members.
For infants and toddlers, ages 0 to 4, the mortality rate is 17 times higher in high gun ownership states than low gun ownership states. Taking guns out of the hands of all people will decrease risks of any non-necessary problems occurring. The biggest claim that people who are anti-gun control have is that it is taking away their rights to bear arms as a part of the second amendment.
Yes, this is true, but not only is this claim unfair but it is exactly what gun laws will change. It almost acts as a lose-lose situation but by eliminating the fear of injury or death would be more worth it in the long run. Why should someone fear a gun when if no one had or could carry them, everybody would be safe? In conclusion, gun control is necessary for a safe place for all.
Without gun control, a gun can get in the wrong hands. Also without background and medical checks, someone mentally unstable can get a gun. Overall, having it to were mostly anyone can get a gun is unsafe for everyone. Even though many people believe it would be for the good of the people, I do not think so. Which of your works would you like to tell your friends about? These links will automatically appear in your email. If you have a suggestion about this website or are experiencing a problem with it, or if you need to report abuse on the site, please let us know.
We try to make TeenInk. Please note that while we value your input, we cannot respond to every message. Also, if you have a comment about a particular piece of work on this website, please go to the page where that work is displayed and post a comment on it.
Don't have an account?
No matter what side you argue, this post will point you to some credible sources for your argumentative gun control essay. 6 Supporting Gun Control Articles. Pro-gun control article #1: Gun Control and the Constitution: Should We Amend the Second Amendment?
Persuasive Pro Gun Control Essay Gun control is a vital necessity to the welfare of our nation. Many people out there are supporting the “anti- gun control cause” with the excuse of “self-defense”.
Given the controversial nature of the topic, this should also pose no problem: either you write a pro gun control argumentative essay, or anti. The next thing you do is collect evidence to support your argument. He blames pro gun control activists for being deaf to arguments from the anti gun control camp and incapable of a constructive dialogue. According to him, they only see their position and will not rest until all individual firearm possession is banned for good.
1. Pro Gun Control Essay Gun Control - Words. Gun Control Bryan Huston English Composition 1 Baker College Gun Control A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed (U.S. Const. amend. Why I’m Pro-Gun Control Gun control is necessary in order to have a peaceful city, country and world. Without gun control, many lives will be taken for unnecessary reasons. Not only should.