A communication analysis explores the significance of an event, speech or artifact by putting it under the microscope of rhetorical theories and techniques. Analyzing the persuasive elements of a speech can help you create an essay that enhances readers' perspectives on a significant communication event. Providing the context of the communication artifact you've chosen can both grab readers' attention and introduce them to the author, when the event took place and the circumstances that led to it.
If you're analyzing Martin Luther King Jr. Knowing the significance of the artifact upfront can help readers feel invested to learn what makes it a successful communication piece and provides context for the analysis that follows. Your thesis statement should clearly define the lens you'll be looking through to analyze the artifact. For example, an audience analysis focuses on how the author reaches his listeners, a feminism essay looks at the function of gender roles in the author's ideas and an ideological essay explores the speech's political views.
Choose a theory to use in analyzing your artifact and craft a thesis statement. If you're writing an ideological analysis of the "I Have a Dream" speech, for example, your thesis might describe how King uses the political contradiction between racism and America's claims of independence and liberty to demonstrate the need for equality.
In the analytical portion of your essay, you'll explore your thesis using direct quotes and examples from the speech or artifact to illustrate your ideas.
One way to keep your thoughts organized is to focus each paragraph on a different tool the author uses to express his message. For example, in the ideological analysis of the "I Have a Dream" speech, you might discuss the comparisons King makes to seminal documents such as the Constitution and Declaration of Independence, his descriptions of the current consequences of segregation and his forecast of a future vision of equality.
Your essay's conclusion should not only wrap up and summarize your ideas, but show audiences what your examination of the artifact can add to what they already know. Demonstrate how looking at the speech from the theoretical lens you've selected enhances its meaning and creates a greater understanding of its importance. For example, an ideological analysis of the "I Have a Dream Speech" could argue for the persistent contradictions between a country that claims to give freedom and liberty, yet doesn't consistently offer that for all.
It can also look at the milestones America has achieved since toward many of King's objectives. Kori Morgan holds a Bachelor of Arts in professional writing and a Master of Fine Arts in creative writing and has been crafting online and print educational materials since She taught creative writing and composition at West Virginia University and the University of Akron and her fiction, poetry and essays have appeared in numerous literary journals.
King wanted no part of any stalling. To King, the march offered an opportunity to end the delay blacks had faced ever since the civil war's promises had long faded.
King knew he wasn't just speaking to the protesters he was speaking to the Kennedy administration, to white Americans apathetic and unaware of the plight of black Americans, and even to segregationists and racists. To speak to these groups was not an easy task. Convincing those who oppose you is difficult enough. But convincing people who believe you are not even equal with them is an even greater task. In addressing this difficult situation, King's speech raises the question, "How can a person who is discriminated against by general society speak out to change people's attitudes about that very discrimination?
King's speech is an important example of attacking discrimination for a variety of reasons. First, it culminated the civil rights march on Washington D. On that August day, the spotlight was on King and he shone with all the brilliant light of the justice of which he spoke. The purpose of my paper will be to show how Martin Luther King used anaphora and urgency to create support for an end to segregation. In doing so, we may come closer to understanding what a marginalized speaker can do to empower him or herself.
Identify the way you wish to approach your subject. Take a look at how you did your analysis. Are you doing a textual analysis? Are you focusing on the story created by the author? Does your analysis point out ways in which the discourse empowers certain people?
From this, choose a method we have or will discuss in class. Neo-Aristotelian--analyze a speaker in a situation on the basis of its effect on the audience and on standards established by Aristotle like ethos, pathos, and logos. Functionalist--analyze how well a rhetoric addresses exigencies how well rhetoric solves a problem. Genre--analyze how a variety of speeches, arguments, or rhetors fit into a category of rhetoric which influences others.
Textual--analyze closely how the organization, rhetorical devices, language, etc. Argument--analyze the reasons in arguments or reasonableness of argument practices. Author--analyze a rhetor's rhetoric to explain the rhetor better or a rhetor to explain the rhetoric better. Audience--analyze the audience at which a rhetoric is directed or envision an audience that the rhetoric creates. Narrativity --analyze the soundness of reasons, values and beliefs that make up the stories that people adhere to or reject.
Metaphor--analyze key terms in a communication which have particularly important meanings that influence others. Dramatism--analyze the ways in which a communication influences the social reality, characters, plots, ideology, psychology, etc.
Social Movements--analyze a group's collective, symbolic action that confronts existing institutions over a period of time. Culture--analyze the kind of norms, rituals, values, ways of acting, roles, etc. Ideological--analyze the political and moral assumptions and judgments made in a communication. Sexuality--analyze the sexual and erotic aspects of symbols in a text. Feminist--analyze the sexism, patriarchy, gender roles, sexual activity, and feminisms in a communication.
Power Relations--analyze the ways in which a communication empowers certain beliefs and marginalizes others. Deconstructionist-analyze how a communication assumes contradictory modes of communication and therefore is self-destructive of its so called objective. Combination of one of these.
For example, in my paper on Brennan and Marshall, I combine textual and argumentation perspectives. One that you make up or that you wish to use, for example, Fantasy Theme analysis. See me if you are going to do this. Develop the method that you choose. Make a specific argument about the method you want to use--avoid generalities. Instead, focus on specific aspects of these methods that help build your specific approach--your specific argument about how a text should be analyzed.
Narrative analysis requires an examination of the fidelity and probability of a text. Snooze--we know this already. What we need is a narrative focus that describes how an audience is led from their experiences to another set of experiences where a story can then be seen as having fidelity and probability. To do this, a narrative must. Mmmmm -I want to read more about this. This person has something to add the conversation about what narrative criticism should do. Keep your discussion focused on what your analysis paper will do.
If you are not going to do what your method paper says you will do--then don't include it in the method. Discuss what others have said about your subject--Literature Review. Focus on articles that discuss or use the method you suggest. Focus on articles that discuss your subject area generally.
Focus on articles that discuss your specific rhetorical act. When you write your conclusion, the goal is, as John Campbell has argued, "to place your essay in perspective and to leave your reader with the sense of an ending" Packet B, , p. To do this you need to do the following: You can discuss some of the highlights of the body of your paper--but do NOT do a conclusion like this: As I have shown, Patrick Henry used three techniques.
First, he used antithesis which helped show the British were evil. Because you already told me the information you are trying to summarize--no need to repeat. If your thesis was to show that Bill Clinton convinced America that he could be a leader, you might have a discussion in your conclusion like this: Bill Clinton demonstrated he was a leader by showing a grasp of both domestic and foreign policy.
But the grasp he showed was not just the arguments he presented, it was also the way in which he presented his knowledge. He went beyond canned statistics.
From Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address to Barack Obama's inaugural address, speeches are time capsules of the values and events of the periods they were given in. A communication analysis explores.
Group Communication Analysis - Communication: Key to any group is the communication of its members. Communication Essays] Powerful Essays words | ( pages) | Preview. Workplace Communication - U01a1 Workplace Communication On January 28, , the whole country watched as the Space .
A communication event analysis paper focuses on meaningful communication activity, describes it, and analyzes it using a relevant theory set of theories. The "event" is a communication episode that involve significant communication activity, such as a planning meeting, an extended interaction. Communication Group Analysis Paper essays For the past eight weeks I have worked closely with a group of five other people with the sole intent of being able to experience what it was like working in a group and being able to analyze the work being done and how it was accomplished. For the most par.
This paper illustrates that email has the potential to be an extremely useful organizational communication tool, but is rendered useless all members . On the other hand, if your method paper suggests doing your analysis a certain way or including a certain kind of analysis that you probably should do--then add on to/change your analysis paper so that it does do what your method paper says it will do.